Apr 062014
 

Wisteria Myths

There is no question that the Southeastern United States has been plagued by invasive wisteria.  A walk down a country road in Georgia this time of year will likely lead to encounters with curtains of blue-violet and white blossoms, suspended from vines in the treetops overhead.  But is the invader Japanse wisteria (Wisteria floribunda) or Chinese wisteria (Wisteria sinense)?  At the root of this question lies an explanation for why invasive plants succeed in taking over large areas in the wild, choking out other vegetation and reducing biodiversity to nearly nil.  And the frightening answer is this:  neither, and both.

Scientists roaming the Southeast recently made twenty-five collections of invasive wisteria for genetic analysis.  In their report, available here, twenty-four out of twenty-five of their collections turned out to be hybrids, blends of both Japanese and Chinese species.  As hybrids, the plants are able to be more successful than either species alone would be, because they have the traits of both parent species.  With greater genetic variability, they can tolerate a wider range of ecological conditions, such as degree of shading, soil type, etc.  Hybrids also tend to be more hardy, and more resistant to insect pests and diseases.  These wisteria hybrids are, effectively, “super plants” — more able to spread and more difficult to erradicate.

What, then, to make of a second myth about wisteria, concerning how to tell the Japanese and Chinese varieties apart?  According to several online sources, including an article on controlling wisteria with herbicides located here, the two wisterias actually twine in different directions.  The Chinese wisteria supposedly twines counterclockwise up a tree trunk, while the Japanese wisteria wends its way up a trunk clockwise.  Furthermore, several sources add, the reason for the difference is that vines in the Northern Hemisphere all bend counterclockwise (the same direction water supposedly empties out of a bathtub), while vines in the Southern Hemisphere bend in the opposite direction.  The Japanese species behaves the way it does, according to this explanation, because it evolved in the Southern Hemisphere, before plate tectonic forces brought Japan to its present position in the Northern Hemisphere.

Another scientific study recently debunked this myth, by showing that counterclockwise vine growth is much more common than was previously thought.  In a multi-year survey of vines all around the world (and on both sides of the Equator), abstracted here, ninety-two percent of the vines were found to twine counter-clockwise, and only eight percent grew in the opposite direction.  What is more, vines in the Southern Hemisphere were no more likely to twine clockwise than vines in the Northern Hemisphere.  Alas, too, the geological explanation behind the twining behavior of Japanese Wisteria, while fascinating, is wrong.  Most flowering plants evolved after the dinosaurs went extinct 65 million years ago.  By that time, Japan was north of the Equator, as can be seen here.

Questions on vine twining certainly remain, though.  Why do most vines twine counterclockwise?  Geographical location has been ruled out.  What is left?  One possibility is that plant vine behavior has something to do with the internal structure of plant cells — specifically, with how microtubules, hollow cylinders in each plant cell, are oriented.  But this hypothesis has not yet been tested.  It is amazing, really, that something so commonplace as the question of why vines twine about a tree in the directions that they do has remained so mysterious for so long.

This article was originally published on April 14, 2010.  A new photograph from Piney Woods Church Road accompanies the text. 

  6 Responses to “Tall Tales of a Tall Vine: Wisteria Myths Debunked (Sunday at the Archives #15)”

  1. I think the lesson here is that people should plant American Wisteria. I think it is negligent on the part of big box stores and other nurseries to even sell invasive plants.

    • Karin,

      I agree wholeheartedly — in fact, I have planted some native wisteria in my front yard. Why are any documented invasive plants available for sale to the public, and without any cautionary statement about the hazards associated with planting them? I discuss this topic with students in the environmental science classes I teach, and they assume that, if you watch a plant carefully, you can keep it from spreading. They forget altogether the various means of seed dispersal that are largely out of our control, from birds to wind gusts. Most of my students were not even aware that many common landscaping plants (like Chinese privet) have become invasive.

      Clifford

      • Ah, with careful attention…but how quickly attention shifts, and a plant is forgotten in the press of daily business. And who has not seen an old apple tree or clump of day lilies growing where once was a house, but no more. Then an invasive plant is free to invade, and the border is unguarded.

      • Glad that you are educating the public. I have spent countless hours removing invasive plants and it really does give one an appreciation of how quickly they spread and the damage that these plants do. I have been educating the public about buddleia and because people don’t see that it is invasive in their gardens it attracts butterflies they just don’t want to remove them. It is a long educational process.

        • Karin, I find it frustrating that nurseries still sell invasive plants, without even being required to include warning labels with them. As a result, the area around my house is filled with privet, wisteria, and honeysuckle. These plants crowd out, and even choke out, many native species.

 Leave a Reply

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

(required)

(required)